Search
Filters
0">
Close

Animal welfare supporter Stella McCartney drops wool supplier

Monday, August 17, 2015

The fashion designer has immediately ceased buying material from Patagonian farms in the southern regions of Argentina and Chile after she was presented with video footage from PETA, which showed scenes of cruelty toward the animals, and insisted she will look to source vegan wool.

She said: ''As a designer who built a brand on not using leather, fur or animal skins in its designs, I can't tolerate it! I am devastated by the news but more determined than ever to fight for animal rights in fashion together and monitor even more closely all suppliers involved in this industry to end all innocent lives. ''We are also looking into vegan 'wool' as well, in the same manner we were able to develop and incorporate high-end alternatives to leather and fur over the years.''

The 43-year-old design icon began working with the farmers as part of a project to help maintain the area of land where the sheep graze.

But Stella says the farm where the sheep were allegedly mistreated is ''one too many''.

She wrote on Instagram: ''It was born as an amazing initiative to help protect a million acres of endangered grasslands in Patagonia whilst looking after the welfare of animals. Unfortunately, after conducting our own investigation in Argentina, following a very distressful viewing of footage provided by the great guys at officialpeta, we found out that one of the 26 ranches we used source sustainable wool there, mistreated its sheep. It is one too many.''

Source: Xpose.ie

Read More >>

Leave your comment
Comments
8/18/2015 12:08 PM
Just one?

Chances are there's more to the story in other articles, but not googling at the moment because I don't enjoy graphic images.  If there was just one farm that was mistreating the sheep, would it have been possible to drop the one farm but keep the farmers who treated their sheep right and are working on sustainability? If it's a matter of the supplier saying "all or nothing"then it's on the supplier, but dropping all 26 farms because of one farm seems like punishing the other 25 farmers for something they didn't do, and I'm personally not a fan of punishing people for the actions of others. In my head it makes more sense to drop the one farm that mistreated the sheep and keep the farms that care for their sheep properly.

Beatles Radio Listener Poll
What Beatles Era do you like better?