Would the Rolling Stones ever have madie it without Keith Richards, would Queen even have made it without Brian May etc. etc. etc......
Of course not, and Paul McCartney / Brian May/ Keith Richards etc. etc would never have made it this way without their bands. If you ever played in a band you know that the combination of talents is what counts, not the talents themselves. That is why Paul and John, Goerge and Ringo never had the same succes as solo artists, how talented they may have been.
John started the Beatles, he was (in the beginning) their natural leader. When he started to lose interest Paul took over and kept the band going for a few years. Without Paul there would have never been "Abbey Road" because George and John were not to keen on recording with the Beatles anymore. So he deserves a lot of credit for that (and many , many other things)
Posted: 2 years ago